Critics & Feedback

Listening, Learning, and Improving—Openly

At Self-Sustainable City, we do not fear criticism.

We see feedback—positive or negative—as an essential part of building something real.

This page exists to openly address common questions, doubts, and critiques people raise about our self-sustainable city initiative. Instead of hiding concerns, we believe in answering them honestly, clearly, and without exaggeration.

Growth happens when conversations are real.

On Sustainability: “Is Everything Truly Sustainable?”

The Concern

Not all materials or practices used in construction appear to be fully sustainable.

Our Response

Complete sustainability is a direction, not a switch. Availability of materials, regional constraints, local skills, and real-world limitations all influence what can be implemented at a given time.

Our priority is not perfection on paper, but practical self-sufficiency and long-term resilience. Wherever possible, we choose eco-friendly materials and regenerative methods. Where limits exist, we remain transparent and continue improving.

Our Commitment

We balance environmental responsibility with durability, affordability, and practicality—while steadily moving toward better solutions.

On Timelines: “Why Do Projects Take Time?”

The Concern

Uncertainty or delays in project completion.

Our Response

Land approvals, legal verification, environmental checks, and community alignment take time—especially when done ethically and carefully. Unlike speculative developments, our process depends on real people coming together, not pre-financed mass construction.

Our Commitment

We communicate openly, update participants regularly, and adjust timelines honestly when conditions change.

On Affordability and Housing Choices

The Concern

Not every home option fits every budget.

Our Response

We offer a wide range—from small homes on quarter-acre plots to larger villas on expansive land. Still, no single project can fit everyone’s financial situation.

Our Commitment

We continuously explore ways to reduce costs without compromising values and welcome suggestions that help make self-sufficient living more accessible.

On Environmental and Local Community Impact

The Concern

How does this project affect nature and nearby communities?

Our Response

Our work focuses on regeneration, not extraction. Food forests, renewable energy, water conservation, and soil restoration are integral—not optional.

We also engage with local communities by working with local labor and supporting regional livelihoods.

Our Commitment

To leave land healthier, communities stronger, and ecosystems more alive than before development.

On Transparency and Communication

The Concern

More clarity is needed on progress and decision-making.

Our Response

Transparency is central to our philosophy. We share progress, challenges, and decisions openly through our website and direct communication.

Our Commitment

We continue improving how we communicate and invite questions at any stage.

On Innovation and Adaptation

The Concern

How will the project evolve with changing technologies and environmental realities?

Our Response

Sustainable living is not static. We actively observe, learn, test, and adapt—whether in energy systems, farming methods, or construction techniques.

Our Commitment

To evolve responsibly, guided by experience, research, and community feedback.

On Investors and Funding

The Concern

Why are there no visible investors?

Our Response

At present, the project is community-funded and personally driven. We are open to investors—but only those aligned with our values, not those seeking short-term extraction.

Our Commitment

Financial transparency and value-aligned partnerships only.

On Construction Quality and Local Workforce

The Concern

Can quality be maintained while using local labor?

Our Response

Yes—but it requires training, supervision, accountability, and patience. Human factors exist, and we acknowledge that quality control is an ongoing effort.

Our Commitment

To maintain clear standards, honest supervision, and continuous improvement of skills on the ground.

On Using Blogspot Instead of a “Professional” Website

The Concern

Why not use a custom domain or expensive website?

Our Response

We consciously choose simplicity. The founder, Ramakrishna Surathu, and the Self-Sustainable City vision already exist beyond platforms.

We prefer investing time and money into land, trees, water, homes, and people, not appearances.

Our Commitment

Digital presence will evolve organically—without losing integrity or purpose.

On Social Media Numbers

The Concern

Why isn’t the following bigger?

Our Response

Follower counts are easy to inflate. We choose not to.

This project values real participation over online popularity. We welcome thoughtful readers, not bots or spectators.

Our Commitment

Organic growth, real people, real impact.

On Slow Progress

The Concern

Why does the project move slowly?

Our Response

Because it is early, and meaningful change takes time. Movements grow when people act—not just observe or doubt.

Progress accelerates when communities participate, share, and contribute.

Our Commitment

We move forward steadily—and invite others to walk with us.

“Many Projects Say This—What Makes You Different?”

The Concern

Why should anyone believe this will work?

Our Response

We don’t claim perfection or guarantee outcomes beyond reality. What we offer is honest effort, real action, and transparency.

We build, test, learn, and improve—on land, not just in words.

Trust is a personal choice. This project is for those ready to act, not just evaluate.

Our Commitment

To do real work, accept criticism, and remain accountable.

Your Voice Matters

Every question helps sharpen the vision.

Every critique helps strengthen the foundation.

If you have thoughts, doubts, or ideas—we want to hear them.

Contact Us

Reach out with your feedback or questions.

Together, we can build something grounded, resilient, and meaningful—for today and for generations to come.